|
Criteria |
Areas of Consideration |
Points
|
|
Research Question, Language use |
· Organized ·
Persuasive arguments and examples ·
Research question is concise and clear ·
Question is stated directly and explained ·
Presentation shows logical thought progression ·
All elements are relevant and well-integrated ·
Appendices included, if relevant |
1 2
3 4 |
|
Background Research, Data and Graphics |
·
Sources cited and credit given when due ·
Supporting print material given to the judges ·
Visual aids support question and aids are carefully chosen |
1 2
3 4 |
|
Completeness and Teamwork |
·
All members involved ·
Original data documented ·
Students are able to answer judges questions ·
The project is clearly the work of the children |
1 2
3 4 |
|
Analysis and Conclusions |
·
Conclusions are clearly supported by data ·
Analysis clearly relates to research question ·
Alternative views considered ·
Relation to personal experience is explained ·
Concrete examples relating presentation to the mission |
1 2
3 4 |
|
Presentation |
·
Creative ·
A joy for the audience-humor, personal touches ·
Edited to 5 minutes ·
Model of Clarity and good speaking ·
Well-rehearsed ·
No technical difficulties ·
Clever choice of presentation style |
1 2
3 4 |
|
|
|
Total points: |
|
|
|
|